Information on Result #471825
There is no (69, 187, 132)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 233 289017 628485 296384 786995 797346 876988 906482 933125 103216 > 2187
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (69, 188, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |