Information on Result #471825

There is no (69, 187, 132)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 233 289017 628485 296384 786995 797346 876988 906482 933125 103216 > 2187

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 188, 132)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction