Information on Result #471885

There is no (68, 188, 129)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 437 499721 420595 658840 717633 817877 365489 757048 109542 765216 > 2188

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (68, 189, 129)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction