Information on Result #471891

There is no (80, 188, 165)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 452 986040 214748 384491 634250 954369 614410 352787 575807 366048 > 2188

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (80, 189, 165)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction