Information on Result #471945

There is no (69, 189, 131)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 815 131891 254725 648816 916866 849274 783247 280613 525110 398432 > 2189

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 190, 131)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction