Information on Result #471945
There is no (69, 189, 131)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 815 131891 254725 648816 916866 849274 783247 280613 525110 398432 > 2189
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (69, 190, 131)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |