Information on Result #471951

There is no (81, 189, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 923 940887 800161 557236 416440 849976 056892 856965 755031 924472 > 2189

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 190, 168)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction