Information on Result #472011

There is no (80, 190, 164)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1995 154381 122939 733066 495821 015429 697561 160284 040208 528672 > 2190

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (80, 191, 164)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction