Information on Result #472065

There is no (69, 191, 131)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3830 788399 415638 311183 662139 896404 439007 841317 195009 736704 > 2191

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 192, 131)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction