Information on Result #472071

There is no (81, 191, 166)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3241 993694 002298 476470 073562 116736 890791 551883 642992 510240 > 2191

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (81, 192, 166)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction