Information on Result #472078

There is no (95, 191, 232)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3671 006832 911262 338976 267969 218847 345859 546139 579360 901140 > 2191

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (95, 192, 232)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction