Information on Result #472133
There is no (82, 192, 169)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6658 461054 540550 266628 930472 559158 690939 610763 632780 369920 > 2192
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (82, 193, 169)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |