Information on Result #472141

There is no (98, 192, 249)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7114 010063 307172 946565 528445 064823 499843 250239 795551 705344 > 2192

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 193, 249)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction