Information on Result #472234

There is no (163, 193, 47954)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 12556 260165 953992 191339 847554 878766 351729 855309 568300 057448 > 2193

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 194, 47954)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction