Information on Result #472254
There is no (82, 194, 168)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 29462 531295 926518 367112 926121 124572 385933 971833 753329 233040 > 2194
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (82, 195, 168)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |