Information on Result #472293

There is no (160, 194, 19529)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 25114 896312 633583 016810 907394 299863 697850 961912 815526 686792 > 2194

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 195, 19529)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction