Information on Result #472315
There is no (81, 195, 164)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 60676 546302 717958 463849 477888 982199 437580 913115 629514 089648 > 2195
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (81, 196, 164)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |