Information on Result #472359

There is no (169, 195, 185700)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 50217 146618 839318 865882 738111 221123 854146 492347 065804 341576 > 2195

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (169, 196, 185700)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction