Information on Result #472377

There is no (82, 196, 167)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 128061 354733 482000 998548 830747 504594 010988 185473 791153 863680 > 2196

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (82, 197, 167)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction