Information on Result #472503
There is no (84, 198, 172)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 434647 583898 400707 476510 317614 256565 214553 312882 588861 285784 > 2198
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (84, 199, 172)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |