Information on Result #472512

There is no (102, 198, 262)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 408508 228398 305045 888638 187001 138874 269043 030780 339486 750480 > 2198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (102, 199, 262)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction