Information on Result #472543

There is no (164, 198, 22993)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 401861 579802 375674 138476 421584 636301 369022 634839 842427 452874 > 2198

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 199, 22993)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction