Information on Result #472566

There is no (85, 199, 175)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 892917 883620 040362 401969 809036 268544 695120 395168 083053 062848 > 2199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 200, 175)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction