Information on Result #472574

There is no (101, 199, 253)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 822568 715573 844357 875069 309921 972777 664675 949154 468575 445518 > 2199

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (101, 200, 253)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction