Information on Result #472628
There is no (82, 200, 164)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 775498 576427 712272 467954 543345 386496 853335 643021 688657 335184 > 2200
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (82, 201, 164)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |