Information on Result #472650

There is no (126, 200, 569)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 691739 376186 681362 615552 389274 634848 920870 188521 654677 572404 > 2200

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 201, 569)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction