Information on Result #472669
There is no (164, 200, 16681)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 607150 315361 191007 285381 517245 848195 873012 264522 669581 131760 > 2200
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 201, 16681)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |