Information on Result #472690
There is no (81, 201, 160)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 303140 511710 474346 100226 263734 744097 661999 908828 573627 384684 > 2201
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (81, 202, 160)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |