Information on Result #472732

There is no (165, 201, 17337)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 214560 388612 789067 838359 989127 072795 390337 007082 232294 276400 > 2201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 202, 17337)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction