Information on Result #472734

There is no (169, 201, 41114)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3 215034 978808 551949 184470 094182 679940 994140 896353 882114 043175 > 2201

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (169, 202, 41114)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction