Information on Result #472766

There is no (104, 202, 267)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 002752 860830 517919 539481 172668 989636 712529 615994 155226 304832 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (104, 203, 267)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction