Information on Result #472772

There is no (116, 202, 379)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 7 027518 461283 820382 078975 324143 503869 849449 789809 978277 605418 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (116, 203, 379)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction