Information on Result #472777

There is no (126, 202, 545)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 740774 875034 630241 965445 310439 589566 100780 716028 796660 800832 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (126, 203, 545)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction