Information on Result #472795
There is no (162, 202, 9085)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 434146 971228 674240 020410 421964 117900 586496 145318 321673 991283 > 2202
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (162, 203, 9085)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction |