Information on Result #472795

There is no (162, 202, 9085)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 434146 971228 674240 020410 421964 117900 586496 145318 321673 991283 > 2202

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 203, 9085)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction