Information on Result #472796
There is no (164, 202, 12551)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 6 429289 932141 382084 388903 321666 392588 070028 591851 368095 404448 > 2202
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (164, 203, 12551)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |