Information on Result #472911

There is no (136, 204, 818)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26 657456 474466 908488 578970 615939 976419 594902 731661 251620 184880 > 2204

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (136, 205, 818)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction