Information on Result #473104

There is no (129, 207, 555)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 216 284273 417800 824677 345860 142723 116969 668182 101889 772925 788996 > 2207

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 208, 555)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction