Information on Result #473149

There is no (86, 208, 173)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 514 264642 282427 767385 845585 889643 856003 214661 432017 305006 376112 > 2208

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (86, 209, 173)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction