Information on Result #473188

There is no (164, 208, 6321)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 412 483316 241647 770059 868062 655081 494602 309222 637801 350115 368144 > 2208

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (164, 209, 6321)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction