Information on Result #473190
There is no (168, 208, 11192)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 411 970712 298925 173101 190499 873201 242591 235649 719702 026396 402997 > 2208
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (168, 209, 11192)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |