Information on Result #473237

There is no (129, 209, 533)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 830 630970 093486 567175 616963 474709 138419 395984 355298 356703 053280 > 2209

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 210, 533)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction