Information on Result #473240

There is no (135, 209, 682)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 828 071350 916486 952035 989587 188818 984920 360746 701965 080408 541786 > 2209

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (135, 210, 682)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction