Information on Result #473318

There is no (160, 210, 3401)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1645 999533 885631 889491 294456 522278 997961 749963 985916 783282 652968 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (160, 211, 3401)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction