Information on Result #473327

There is no (178, 210, 60729)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1645 911198 595739 966777 630340 259507 728114 109539 523298 524166 727385 > 2210

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (178, 211, 60729)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction