Information on Result #473386

There is no (163, 211, 4309)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3292 554903 649291 767034 506346 293254 505651 811513 845689 845799 625896 > 2211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (163, 212, 4309)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction