Information on Result #473390

There is no (171, 211, 12421)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 3292 979615 884889 954711 887121 719671 205936 605966 624451 238719 266136 > 2211

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (171, 212, 12421)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction