Information on Result #473554
There is no (96, 214, 205)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 27802 710962 327826 114251 985692 381223 590520 195582 239573 206731 920768 > 2214
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (96, 215, 205)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |