Information on Result #473585

There is no (158, 214, 2217)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26360 990229 723650 435658 344295 598731 094028 529790 350367 814410 482600 > 2214

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (158, 215, 2217)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction