Information on Result #473587

There is no (162, 214, 3132)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 26481 727066 153499 005902 787890 295690 502576 768532 889137 130818 141721 > 2214

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (162, 215, 3132)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction