Information on Result #473621
There is no (95, 215, 200)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 55759 381229 715867 184183 062430 358754 684335 874471 727977 978783 379688 > 2215
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (95, 216, 200)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |