Information on Result #473646

There is no (145, 215, 932)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 52683 423324 289589 430698 286054 737974 638987 020616 792638 350293 804747 > 2215

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (145, 216, 932)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction