Information on Result #473708

There is no (132, 216, 524)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 106992 431731 034125 892103 687773 864186 640937 291456 299309 256949 297808 > 2216

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (132, 217, 524)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction